5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law
5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law
Blog Article
Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by legislation." It truly is perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Due to the recent amendment, the court imposed a more severe sentence than would have been feasible under the previous Edition on the law.
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the summary or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court might interfere with the conclusion or perhaps the finding and mould the relief to make it acceptable to your facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified because of the decision of your Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Section 302 from the Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to act as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application of your death penalty or life imprisonment depends over the specifics of each case, together with any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.
The claimed recovery may be used, at the most, for corroboration from the main evidence, but by itself it cannot be described as a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of event. The claimed memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as nothing at all was discovered due to such pointation. The place of event plus the place of throwing the dead body were already within the knowledge of witnesses ahead of their pointation with the petitioners. Reliance can also be placed on case legislation titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it has been held through the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:
Power to levy tax and to legislate on immovable property which include tax on annual rental value of immovable property after 18th Amendment(CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973)
Extra username and password are expected for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it necessitates legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be created and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
When the petitioner is simply present for the place of occurrence without causing any injury to the deceased or PWs then in these kinds of circumstances, whether he is vicariously liable shall be decided with the figured out trial click here Court after recording on the evidence.
How much sway case law holds could differ by jurisdiction, and by the exact circumstances on the current case. To check out this concept, evaluate the following case regulation definition.
To invoke section three hundred and 302 just because death has occurred is the greatest tragedy of all. It does the exact opposite of what a legal system is there to do, i.e. protected its citizens.
A reduced court might not rule against a binding precedent, even though it feels that it is unjust; it might only express the hope that a higher court or even the legislature will reform the rule in question. In case the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and wishes to evade it and help the law evolve, it could both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts of your cases; some jurisdictions allow for just a judge to recommend that an appeal be carried out.
During the United States, folks are not needed to hire an attorney to represent them in either civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their have can remember a single rule of thumb when it concerns referring to case regulation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as you possibly can, leading the court, not only to your case, but towards the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.